How to Write the Internet's Best Article on Any Subject

Want to know what’s intimidating?

Trying to write the Internet’s best article on a given subject — an article that is way better than anything online.

That’s not just intimidating. It sounds pretentious, right?

Is it not the height of arrogance to assume that you can unleash an article that makes the industry’s best writers, leaders, and savants gape in astonishment at your brilliance and insight?

Perhaps.

But don’t we all want to write something like that? Wouldn’t it be great to create a zinger of an article and land at the top of the search engines?

Most of us want to create content that succeeds in spite of heavy competition. What seems to be lacking is a solid and proven methodology for doing so.

What you’re about to read is a step-by-step guide that teaches you exactly how to do it.

This process worked for me. While consulting with one of digital marketing’s authorities, I was able to generate millions of unique monthly pageviews (search traffic galore) on blog articles as a result of using this process.

I was producing articles in a content-saturated market with a bajillion articles on every conceivable topic. Yet when we refined and executed the method explained below, our articles started hitting the top of the search results in a matter of months.

We went from zero to domination in just under one year.

Let me be clear. What worked for me in one industry may not work for you in your industry. Results vary. I want you to know this information, because it could work. And for me, it did work.

With those caveat lectors in place, this article presents a process-driven method for writing an article or blog post that is better than anything that's been written on the subject.

1. Gather your resources.

When I refer to an “article,” you may substitute the term “blog post.” The deliverable is simple: written content for your website or blog that is superior to anything else.

But before you open up a Google document and start writing the world’s greatest blog post, you’ll need to gather your resources.

You should have clear answers to the following three questions:

1. What specific subject are you writing about?
2. What keyword are you trying to rank for?
3. What is the “best” article currently available on this subject?

I’ll walk through each of those points in detail.

What specific subject are you writing about?

The more detailed, the better. You will not be able to create a SERP-crushing piece of awesomeness unless you know exactly what it is your content is about.

What keyword are you trying to rank for?

Please don’t dismiss this point as some needless SEO gimmick. Like it or not, your article will only get eyeballs in search by targeting a specific longtail keyword.

What is the “best” article currently available on this subject?

Best is a qualitative word and, thus, totally up for argument. However, “best” according to Google is the number one position in the search results for your given keyword.

Thankfully, we don’t need to do too much guessing to figure out what Google thinks is the “best.” To find out what the best article is, just Google your keyword and see what shows up at the top of the search results page.

Let me give you a quick example.

In one recent effort, I was creating an article for LitCharts on the topic of words that Shakespeare invented. The target keyword: words shakespeare invented.

I Googled it. Then, I picked the top article. I’m done, right?

Sorta.

But not so fast.

Although Google’s results are generally pretty good in determining search ranking (based on 200+ factors), they’re not always a reliable judge of truly well-written content. The qualitative question cannot be answered by Google alone. You may have to do a bit of value judging here.

You don’t have to settle this issue conclusively. You can select more than one “best” article. In your situation, you may want to pick the number one search result and something a little further down the page.

Now, gather some information on this article:

• What is the headline?
• How many words long is it?
• How many images does it have?
• How many sections does it have?

Most of these metrics you can get by manually counting. For word count, you can follow this quick process:

Highlight and copy the content of the article itself. (Try not to highlight sidebar, header, or footer material.)

Here’s what I did when copying the “best” piece of content on Shakespeare’s words. I highlighted the body:

Then, I opened up WordCounter.net in another tab, and pasted the content that I just copied:

Record this number — the top number in the right sidebar — in your notes.

Now you’re ready to start creating your content.

2. Write a better headline than the “best” article.

According to a hackneyed factoid, 20% of content readers won’t read past the headline. If you have a ho-hum headline, you can expect the lackluster 20% to click through and read your content. But if you create a really good headline, you will probably gain more readers.

So, how do you create a “really good headline?” Unless your name is David Ogilvy, you may not know where to start.

This isn’t an article on headline writing. But since the headline forms such a critical component of any article, it’s worth discussing.

I’ll provide two data-backed tips for creating stellar headlines:

1. Choose the right words — superlative adjectives and emotion words.

The specific words you use in your headline matter. Humans who speak any language have a visceral connection with certain words due to the association of those words with a given emotion, memory, or sensation.

Some researchers assert that “words can change your brain” by altering gene expression, thus prompting amygdala activity and therefore hormonal output. The mental reaction time to such words is virtually instantaneous:

Just seeing the word (as opposed to actually cognitively processing it) can produce such a reaction.

What kinds of words are so poignant?

The research points to two main categories of words. The first category is emotion words. These terms trigger any one of the major emotions — anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, or surprise.

The range of emotion-triggering words is endless. A word such as bright can spark the emotion of happiness. A term like last chance can elicit feelings of fear. Describing something as delightful may introduce the emotion of surprise.

The second major category of powerful words is adjectives. While some of these words are obviously emotion words, as described above, there is particular category of adjectives and adverbs that I want to focus on: superlatives.

Superlative adjectives are words like most, best, highest, longest, biggest, shortest, smallest, etc. Superlatives tend to tap into reader’s curiosity. Kevan Lee, writing for Buffer, explains that superlatives “make promises that the reader finds intriguing.”

Negative words like never or worst are particularly compelling when it comes to superlative usage:

But what about clickbait? Doesn’t all this talk of emotionalism, sensationalism, and superlativism (wait, is that a word?) point to the creation of clickbait?

Well, what IS clickbait?

According to the OED, clickbait is “content whose main purpose is to attract attention and encourage visitors to click on a link to a particular web page.” That’s not inherently an evil thing, but you'd better have content to back it up.

And that’s exactly what this method proposes — creating content (not just a headline) that appeals to readers. The most notoriously clickbaity content on the Interwebz is of the curiosity gap variety.

Need an example?

[caption id="attachment_33810" align="aligncenter" width="446"]

Source: http://www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/photos/absurdly-bad-clickbait-headlines[/caption]

Sometimes, such clickbaity headlines do use superlatives. Like “absolutely,” or emotional words like “terrible.”

Sometimes, clickbait headlines are downright macabre.

Headlines like these are not necessary.

Nor are they advised.

Nor are they ethical.

Headlines like this employ the dubious curiosity gap technique and often lead to content that is disingenuous or disappointing.

The entire point of this entire article is to make great content. Great content invalidates clickbait headlines. Focus on deep, solid content. Only make promises in a headline that you can keep in your content.

Use superlatives. Use emotional words. Avoid clickbait. And your headlines will work better.

2. Full sentences work.

Research from CoSchedule shows that headlines between 60-100 characters have the highest level of engagement.

The average sentence is 75-100 characters. Thus, it makes sense to use a whole sentence — around 60-100 characters — as a headline. A complete sentence has the power to convey a complete thought.

Though headline virality is trend-driven, it’s important to note that the full-sentence headline trend is particularly effective as of early 2018.

Notice how Vox has full 1-2 sentence headlines as their most-shared posts over the past 12 months.

The same trend holds true in the top-shared posts of Business Insider throughout 2017. Most of them are full sentences.

The point is this: if you need to write a full sentence as a headline, go ahead. It might actually work better.

Don’t be afraid to spend some time curating a good headline. Often, it’s better to create your headline after you’ve written the article, since this gives your brain time to ruminate on the topic.

Your goal isn’t to make your content fit your headline, but for your headline to announce what the article is all about — and why it’s worth the reader’s time to click and read.

Tactical takeaways:

• Use emotional words in your headline.
• Use negative superlatives in your headline.
• Use full sentences as the headline.

3. Make your article longer than the “best” article.

Length matters.

As an SEO researcher, I’ve participated in data-driven studies that relentlessly prove a single point: longform articles get more web traffic, social shares, and backlinks.

Here are the charts from HubSpot to visually communicate the point.

The number on the Y-axis refers to the number of words in an article/page. The non-enumerated bars on the X-axis displays, comparatively, how many shares, how much traffic, and how many linking domains articles of that length received. Longer orange bars are better.

Articles exceeding 2,000 words generally perform better according to the standard benchmarks of shares, traffic, and domains.

If there are three things that content marketers love, it’s social shares, traffic, and backlinks. The way to get these things is simple: go long. Longform content is better. It’s that simple.

It should go without saying that fluff isn’t acceptable. When I designed 4k-10k word articles for my clients, I would analyze and strategize the content using tools like MarketMuse to make sure that it was both deep and wide — touching all the relevant subjects and going deep in a few of those subjects.

Now that I’ve made the longer is better point, I want to back off the pedal just a bit. You may not have scads of time at your disposal to write War & Peace. An uberlong article could take days to write.

Maybe you don’t have days to write. Maybe you just have a few hours on a weekend to scramble out that week’s blog article.

And that’s okay.

If you can only write a 300-word post, you’re not wasting your time. You are still creating value. On the MeetEdgar blog you may have heard the string analogy: “A good blog post is like a good piece of string - it's exactly as long as it needs to be.”

Take, for example, Seth Godin, veritable demigod of marketing. As MeetEdgar has explained in the past, Godin isn’t exactly publishing thousands of words in each blog article, is he now?

Shorties can work.

Tactical takeaway:

How long is long enough? 2,500 words is a safe general number, but the specific length depends on the “best” article that you’re trying to take down.

4. Provide more research in your article than the “best” article.

Although eyes tend to glaze and minds tend to numb in the face of data and research, I still recommend using it in your article.

It’s okay if the average reader skims over your summary of that peer-reviewed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study article you just cited. Why? Because you communicated authority simply by doing your research and citing that journal.

When I created my article on Shakespeare’s word inventions, I tried to muster a modicum of authority by citing authoritative publications, linking to the OED, and having a couple Harvard literature grads edit the article.

It all paid off. The article began to gain respect from universities in three different countries, including a backlink from Yale.

People recognize thorough research and hard work. More to the point, most people respect it.

Tactical takeaways:

• Discuss salient research that proves the claims of your article.
• Link out to authoritative websites or journals that substantiate your claims.

5. Go deeper than the “best” article.

My advice is to write a deep article - deeper than the best article out there on the subject.

But what does deep mean?

First, I can tell you what it doesn’t mean:

• Deep is not the same as opaque or unclear.
• Deep writing can be just as lucid as a third-grade storybook.
• Deep is not saying everything that could be said about a given subject.

What is deep, then?

A piece of deep content answers readers’ major questions about a subject.

Say you’re writing about hamster pellets.

Random, I know.

Your readers probably have questions:

What kind of pellets? What do they have in them? Why not seeds? What about carrots? What about hamster gut health? What should the hamster’s droppings look like? What is a “natural” hamster diet? Are hamster pellets vegan? Where do you buy hamster pellets? What are the best hamster pellets? What do they have in them? Can you share data from any longitudinal studies on hamsters eating pellets vs. seed?

You get the idea. I’m no hamster expert, but if I were researching the optimal diet for hamsters, I would want information that answered my major questions.

“Depth not breadth” was sort of a slogan a few years back as leading content marketers realized with a pang of shock and horror that broad content was ineffective and inconsequential in reaching their target audience.

The CEO of Medium, Ev Williams, made this point with a few expletives and a well-aimed discussion titled, “A mile wide, an inch deep.”

Williams, a champion of longform over against microblogging, made a great point:

“Most Internet companies would build better things and create more value if they paid more attention to depth than breadth.”

Contently, sitting in the amen corner, published an article called “Why ‘Depth Not Breadth’ Is the Rallying Cry of Content Marketing.”

It’s not just rants that make the point. It’s research, too.

Brafton and other data-digging organizations like Content Marketing Insights have rallied numbers to the cause. Deep content is more successful at reaching and converting one’s target audience.

As long as you understand what deep means, you can create content that is successful. Deep content works better, ranks higher, spreads farther.

Basically, deep content wins.

Tactical takeaway:

Answer your readers big questions, thereby going deep with your content.

6. Provide more step-by-step guidance than the “best article.”

One of Don Draper’s most memorable lines is “people want to be told what to do so badly that they’ll listen to anyone.”